U.K. Rejects Appeal on Bayer Cancer Drug
| May 26, 2010 | Posted by admin under Cancer |
LONDON—Rejecting an appeal by Bayer AG, the U.K.’s health-care cost-effectiveness watchdog Wednesday confirmed that Britain’s state health system shouldn’t pay for the German company’s liver-cancer drug Nexavar, “because its high cost could not be justified by its marginal benefit.”
Nexavar, also known by the generic name sorafenib, is made by Bayer and Onyx Pharmaceuticals Inc. and is seen as a potential blockbuster product. Bayer had appealed an earlier decision made by the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence, or NICE, last year after the regulator rejected Nexavar in a preliminary review.
Bayer then offered to provide every fourth pack for free, but that concession didn’t satisfy NICE. Drug companies negotiating with NICE sometimes offer free products instead of lowering their price, because they fear a concession on price would lead other countries to demand lower prices, too.
The independent body was considering Nexavar to treat advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, or HCC, in patients who are unable to have surgery or other treatments. Normal life expectancy for these patients is less than 24 months.
NICE said trial evidence it saw “showed that sorafenib increases survival by an average further 2.8 months, but at a cost of £27,000 per patient. Half of the patients who gained some benefit received less than this amount of additional life.”
Andrew Dillon, chief executive of NICE, said: “We were disappointed not to have been able to recommend the use of sorafenib, but after carefully considering all the evidence, including the proposed patient access scheme in which the manufacturer offered to provide every fourth pack free, sorafenib does not provide enough benefit to patients to justify its high cost.”
Noting that the regulator has changed its approach to appraising high-cost treatments, which can potentially extend life for terminally ill patients, NICE’s Dillion said: “We looked at sorafenib in just the same way but the price is simply too high to justify using National Health Service] money which could be spent on better value, more effective cancer treatments.”
Nicole Farmer, business unit head of Bayer Schering Pharma Oncology in the U.K., said: “We are deeply disappointed and frustrated for patients that NICE did not reconsider some of the data and ensure that real innovations in health care, like Nexavar, are made available to all who need it.”
Andrew Wilson Webb, chief executive of the Rarer Cancers Foundation, in a statement said: “In rare cancers such as HCC, the survival benefit and quality of life that sorafenib can offer patients is unique. The appeal process has overlooked an enormous amount of evidence and the irrational final ruling discriminates against these patients … It is a sad state of affairs that we are now the only country in the EU that doesn’t prescribe this drug as a matter of course.”
Related Posts
- Liver cancer is a serious disease (1.000)
- Study reveals huge overdiagnosis of cancer causing unnecessary treatment and suffering (1.000)
- Breast Cancer ? Are Your Genes to Blame? (1.000)
- Bladder Cancer Survival Rates: Getting Lower Or Higher? (1.000)
- Mole Or Malignancy – How To Tell One From The Other (1.000)
- Your Feelings When You Are Told You Have Cancer (1.000)
- Cancer Nutrition Diet – Your Shield Against Cancer (1.000)
- Cold Cuts Increase Bladder Cancer Risk (1.000)
- What Is Breast Cancer? Answers From Doctors (1.000)
- New Cancer Treatment For Teen With Cancer (1.000)
This is the default footer layout. You can easily add or remove columns in the footer.
Recent Comments